SKIP TO PAGE CONTENT
Weather Information:

A&M-Texarkana will shift to the remote work environment for appropriate university operations for Friday, January 10, 2025. For assistance with enrollment and advising needs please click here.

Research Proposal Checklist

Background and Significance of the Research

  • Will the results of the research fill a gap in our knowledge?
  • Will the research advance our understanding of this topic?

Literature Review

  • Does the proposal demonstrate thorough and current understanding and knowledge of the peer- reviewed literature related to the topic?
  • Is the literature reviewed critically?
  • Does the literature review identify gaps, shortcomings, and/or limitations in existing research, therefore providing a context for the study?
  • Does the literature review justify the question/problem being studied?

Theoretical Framework

  • Is a theoretical framework identified and clearly described?
  • Is the theoretical framework linked to the research problem/question/hypothesis?
  • Does the theoretical framework demonstrate understanding of current and relevant peer-reviewed literature?

Research Problem/Question/Hypothesis

  • Does the proposal clearly frame the research question/problem/hypothesis?
  • Is the research problem/question/hypothesis logical and researchable?
  • Is the research problem/question/hypothesis manageable and achievable?
  • Is the research problem/question/hypothesis ethical?
  • Is the research question/problem/hypothesis focused and grounded in relevant peer-reviewed literature?
  • Where relevant, is the research grounded in the researcher’s experience and context?

Methodology

Rationale for Research Method

  • Is the methodology (e.g., quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods) appropriate for the research question/problem?
  • Does the proposal identify and describe the specific type of methodology (e.g., qualitative (ethnography, grounded theory, case study, etc.), quantitative (descriptive, quasi-experimental, etc.), or mixed methods (from both traditions)?
  • Is the methodology clearly articulated and supported by current and relevant peer-reviewed literature?

Research and Data-Gathering Procedures

  • Are the procedures well organized and clearly described in a carefully focused step-by-step, straight- forward manner?
  • Are the procedures consistent with the selected methodology?
  • Are the methods reasonable and appropriate for the research question/problem?
  • Is a timeline for the project provided? Is it manageable and achievable?
  • Does the proposal demonstrate thorough and current understanding and knowledge relevant peer reviewed literature related to selected research and data-gathering procedures?

Data Analysis

  • Does the proposal identify possible methods for data analysis?
  • Does the proposal demonstrate thorough and current understanding and knowledge of the research/peer reviewed literature related to their data analysis?

Ethical Considerations

  • Does the proposal anticipate and/or discuss potential difficulties and obstacles in the approach I have chosen?
  • Have I fully considered potential benefits and risks to research participants?
  • Does the proposal discuss how confidentiality of subjects and their responses will be maintained?
  • Does the proposal discuss how data will be stored to ensure confidentiality of subjects?

References

  • Does the proposal provide a list of cited references?
  • Are the references current and relevant?
  • Is APA used appropriately in the reference list?
  • Are references cited appropriately in the literature review, theoretical framework, and description of methodology?

Overall

  • Is the proposal coherent and easily understood by reviewers?
  • Is peer-reviewed literature used effectively to support the proposal’s theoretical underpinnings?
  • Are headings used to organize sections and demonstrate understanding of essential components?
  • Do the headings reflect an organizational structure for the final product?
  • Is the research, as proposed, likely to get ethics approval?
  • Are there any spelling, grammar, punctuation, or presentation features that interfere with coherence and clarity?
  • Is APA formatting consistent and appropriately applied?

Contact the Office of Research and Sponsored Projects

Mandy Davis
Grants Administrator
University Center 414R
(903) 223-3125
For Research Inquires email: